Skip to main content

From Exhilarating Beginnings to Dreaded Ends

 

We've all been there, were out and we meet someone new, someone we actually enjoy being around and so the story begins. There are specific stages all relationships go through, and a great model to look at when deciphering where your relationship stands is the Knapp's Relational Model. You may be wondering, "why would I use a model to determine my next steps or where my relationship is going?", well I'll tell you. The Knapps model incorporates two individual models in itself. Covering ten steps, each model has its own five. In the escalation model these steps include initiating, experimenting, intensifying, integrating, and bonding. The escalation phase is always the better of the two models to stay in. The second model, the termination model is no one's favorite. The stages of this model are differentiating, circumscribing, stagnating, avoiding, and the hardest stage, termination


Termination is the ending of a relationship by both individuals involved or simply by one.  A mutual separation is always the easiest, but it doesn't always work out that way. In my experience, I have never had the simple parting of ways. Ending a relationship whether that be with a friend, or a partner can be heartbreaking for both of you, we never want to hurt another person but sometimes we just have to put ourselves first.

In my most recent relationship, it came down to two people who simply wanted different things, and while I saw this, he did not want to acknowledge it. We were two people trying to fit the wrong puzzle pieces together. Long story short this did not work out well in the end. Throughout the termination model, I looked back and remembered how each of us played a role in the stages, almost to a tea. There were definitely differences being seen, communication and reciprocal listening went out the window, I did end up feeling very stuck because of this and finally began avoiding any emotional or physical encounters. I confronted him, telling him things were not working and that I thought a break would do us good, although he was not happy with the idea he conceded. When asking for this space it was not given which led to the ultimate outcome of our relationship. At the time of the breakup, it was obviously hard because I knew I would be hurting someone who I cared about, so I very kindly spoke my truth. 

In breakups we have to be very honest and up-front, I feel this is the only way true closure can be found and no one has to walk away with a dirty conscience. Being sensitive and treating everyone with the Golden Rule in mind is key. Remember, it's okay for things that were once great to come to an end, it's in the best interest of everyone, if things aren't working out, to walk away and allow room for something better for the both of you. Although me and this person are not on speaking terms, I feel good knowing that we did all we could to salvage the relationship and I can come away from it knowing more than when I went in. 

If you would like to learn more about Knapp's methods, please visit: 
And if you are interested in healthy ways to save or end a relationship visit: 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Toulmin Method

  What is the Toulmin Method? The Toulmin method is a six-step method used to analyze arguments and create persuasive comments. The steps include claim, data, warrant, backing qualifier and rebuttal.   The Steps:    1. Claim: a claim is a statement or a point that the writer wants to argue. In online communications this can even be opinionated statements.  2. Data: Data, or grounds as the diagram above shows, is the evidence or factual backing the supports the claim. Using credible research here is key.  3. Warrant: This connects the researched data and the claim, meaning it is used as further evidence.  4. Backing: Backing is further evidence to support the warrant, online communications may use reports or studies to back their warrant.  5. Qualifier: The qualifier is used to narrow the scope of claim. They make the argument more precise.  6. Rebuttal: The rebuttal showcases the other side of the argument. They allow readers to hear the opin...

The Argumentative Online User

  Online arguments can be messy and downright cruel in certain situations. It is very easy to start rattling off words without thinking of the people on the other side of the screen. A good example of this is a debate that went down on a People.com Instagram post regarding the basketball phenom, Caitlin Clark. A mild debate broke out after a controversial encounter occurred between the player and a reporter. After certain hand gestures and words were used, many viewers and professionals were off put. The reporter received much backlash from the public and was punished by his employers. I chose this argument as I’ve seen many similar argumentative tactics in my own personal social media usage. I think it is very common for online arguments to present this way which makes it a great example. As for the online debate, words used were also quite controversial between users. I will insert images of a couple different threads under the People.com post.  Another thread stated… ...

About Me

  Hi everyone! My name is Reilly, and I am an Agricultural Science Major. I am aiming to work in the livestock/agricultural industries after I graduate. I have raised all different kinds of livestock, from horses to hogs and today I work as an equine vet assistant. My end goal remains uncertain; I may work towards becoming a veterinarian or work in feed/vet med/agricultural sales. In my free time I am a volunteer youth basketball coach in my hometown. I have been doing this for roughly five years now and absolutely love it. When it comes to my hopes in regard to this class, I hope to learn how to effectively use online communications to my advantage whether it be personal or professional relations.