Skip to main content

The Toulmin Method

 

What is the Toulmin Method?

The Toulmin method is a six-step method used to analyze arguments and create persuasive comments. The steps include claim, data, warrant, backing qualifier and rebuttal.
 
The Steps: 
 
1. Claim: a claim is a statement or a point that the writer wants to argue. In online communications this can even be opinionated statements. 
2. Data: Data, or grounds as the diagram above shows, is the evidence or factual backing the supports the claim. Using credible research here is key. 
3. Warrant: This connects the researched data and the claim, meaning it is used as further evidence. 
4. Backing: Backing is further evidence to support the warrant, online communications may use reports or studies to back their warrant. 
5. Qualifier: The qualifier is used to narrow the scope of claim. They make the argument more precise. 
6. Rebuttal: The rebuttal showcases the other side of the argument. They allow readers to hear the opinions and facts of those not in support of the claim. 


Use in Online Communications: 

This method can be extremely helpful to online communications as they allow writers to easily support and back their claims. Writer and authors can easily use hyperlinks, graphs, and citations from other online sources as evidence. They can also easily find rebuttals and engage in educated debates this way. 

The Challenges to Consider:

- Information Overload: There is a lot of information and opinions on the internet that can clutter a person's mind. Critical thinking is necessary here. 
- Emotions: Keeping biases out of research can be difficult, writers must be able to keep their personal emotions out of the way of their argument's credibility. 
- Echo Chambers: To avoid largely agenda-based communities on the internet, diversify your search to find multiple points and voices.

If you would like to learn more about the Toulmin Method, you can visit: Toulmin Argument - Purdue OWL® - Purdue University



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Argumentative Online User

  Online arguments can be messy and downright cruel in certain situations. It is very easy to start rattling off words without thinking of the people on the other side of the screen. A good example of this is a debate that went down on a People.com Instagram post regarding the basketball phenom, Caitlin Clark. A mild debate broke out after a controversial encounter occurred between the player and a reporter. After certain hand gestures and words were used, many viewers and professionals were off put. The reporter received much backlash from the public and was punished by his employers. I chose this argument as I’ve seen many similar argumentative tactics in my own personal social media usage. I think it is very common for online arguments to present this way which makes it a great example. As for the online debate, words used were also quite controversial between users. I will insert images of a couple different threads under the People.com post.  Another thread stated… ...
Post a Comment
Read more

About Me

  Hi everyone! My name is Reilly, and I am an Agricultural Science Major. I am aiming to work in the livestock/agricultural industries after I graduate. I have raised all different kinds of livestock, from horses to hogs and today I work as an equine vet assistant. My end goal remains uncertain; I may work towards becoming a veterinarian or work in feed/vet med/agricultural sales. In my free time I am a volunteer youth basketball coach in my hometown. I have been doing this for roughly five years now and absolutely love it. When it comes to my hopes in regard to this class, I hope to learn how to effectively use online communications to my advantage whether it be personal or professional relations.  
Post a Comment
Read more